What does it cost to have a tradesperson attend your house for services?
Well, consider this, van cost say $30,000, insurances say $5,000
including vehicle, workers comp, liability, third party and it goes on,
materials say $5,000, but a bunnings store is needed to cover everything.
Petrol, maintenance, workers wages, state payroll taxes, PAYE taxes,
GST, taxes on profit, and again, the list goes on.
So, if you want a professional tradesperson to attend your home, think
about the worker getting a decent wage, like you do, and all the
ancillary costs involved in getting that person there.
Australia has a high cost of living and this is reflected in the cost of goods and services as well as a decent wage.
If you want cheaper goods, go to a failed state like Greece, where no one pays tax, so society fails.
27 September 2012
21 September 2012
A Tale of Two Cities (Apologies to Charles Dickens)
Socialism
The driving
force behind socialism is the thought that everyone is equal. How this plays
out in reality is another matter. Enforced equality is generated by redistribution
of wealth and income, one of the basic tenants of Socialism (and Australian Labor
and the USA Democrats).
So under Socialism,
a businessman is allowed to set up a business making widgets and to do this he
employs people. He makes his widgets and sells them on the market to consumers.
He ends up making a profit after paying for materials to make the widgets,
paying wages to those he employs to construct the widgets, paying taxes on his
profit after deductions. The businessman ends up with a tidy sum, and thanks to
his entrepreneurial skills, can afford to buy a bigger house, a better car, take
more holidays and generally have a better standard of living than those he
employs. He is also paying a much larger amount in taxes than those he employs.
Those taxes,
along with the taxes of the employed, are used to construct roads, build
hospitals, pay teachers, employ police, fireman and bureaucrats, including
politicians.
The businessman’s
income is such that his lifestyle upsets some other members of society who feel
that they are being exploited to fund his lifestyle. They want part of his
largess. They convince certain politicians to increase taxes of widgets, which
delivers more money to bureaucrats to spend on hospitals etc.
This is
where it gets tricky, because the widgets are wanted by all, but they have
become more expensive because the tax increase has forced the price of widgets
up, the businessman has increased his prices to keep his income the same. The
politicians are not happy with this so they introduce new taxes so that the
workers can have more pay, more bureaucrats are employed to distribute the new
taxes. This has a
crippling effect
on the business as less employees are available to work as the bureaucrats are
being paid more and with better conditions than those who actually do
constructive work making the widgets. So more workers choose to be bureaucrats
than constructive widget workers.
The businessman
sees that things are tough so he turns down production and because of supply
and demand action he actually sees that the price of widgets increases, but he
is employing less, but paying more taxes. As his company grew, so did the bureaucracies
that end up competing with his enterprise in terms of workers and resources.
The workers
unite to form unions to demand more wealth and cut off the means of production
from the widget maker. He is distraught, the government despises him because he
is a fat cat hoarding money away from the exploited workers who are defended by
the bureaucrats that sponge upon such workers.
The
businessman throws the towel in and closes up shop and sets up production in
Africa.
Now the quality
of life is abject in Widgetland as the workers have no jobs but demand income
from bureaucrats that are also receiving no funds as the taxpayer have disappeared.
The government borrows to pay the teeming hordes, but soon finds that the banks
will only go so far and the Land of Widget becomes a failed state. Everyone
loses everything and it is all owned by a foreign entity.
Capitalism
The driving force
behind capitalism is the thought that everyone is not equal. How this plays out
in reality is much like nature intended. Everyone have the right to make
themselves what they can out of what resources they can utilise, one of the basic
tenants of capitalism (and Australian Liberal and USA Republicans).
Under Capitalism,
a businessman is allowed to set up a business making widgets and to do this he
employs people. He makes his widgets and sells them on the market to consumers.
He ends up making a profit after paying for materials to make the widgets,
paying wages to those he employs to construct the widgets, paying taxes on his
profit after deductions. The businessman ends up with a tidy sum, and thanks to
his entrepreneurial skills, can afford to buy a bigger house, a better car, take
more holidays and generally have a better standard of living than those he
employs. He is also paying a much larger amount in taxes than those he employs.
Those taxes,
along with the taxes of the employed, are used to construct roads, build
hospitals, pay teachers, employ police, fireman and bureaucrats, including
politicians.
The businessman’s
income is such that his lifestyle upsets some other members of society who feel
that they are being exploited to fund his lifestyle. They want part of his
largess. This is where the story differs, because those employees who want a
larger share go and see the businessman and convince him that if they can up
their individual production then they should receive a larger share of the profits.
The businessman thinks this through and agrees to individual contracts to reward
those that deliver more.
As the
Widgets are being turned out in greater numbers, the cost goes down and more
are being bought, taxes are increased with more sales, income and profit, all
without the interference of any bureaucracy.
More people
are employed being constructive, incomes are rising and taxes are increasing.
More is available for better roads, hospitals and teachers. Police numbers are
not required to jump as mostly everyone is busy being productive and consuming and
using the widgets being made.
The
businessman throws a party and opens another factory in Widgetland.
The workers
are happy and compete against each other in a desire to be above one another,
competition is played out in work, sports, daily life, things get better as
society improves.
Quality of
life is great in Widgetland, so much so that the bankers seek out the government
to see if they can invest the spare cash in other enterprises. The land of
Widget thrives.
12 September 2012
Labor, Labor, Labor
Haven't posted for a while, been busy working, paying taxes, all those small things that collectively businesses and people keep this country humming along with.
Speaking of working, the Mining industry seems affected by something, a lurgy of sorts, that is causing it to contract. A combination of low pricing, high taxes, industrialised work practices, and a high spending Federal Government will do that to you. I guess the only thing to do is go to bed, sip lemon drinks, wait for the lurgy to go away, and under a new Coalition Federal Government, re-enter the game. The conditions should improve under new steering hands that encourage co-operation rather than enforcement, discussion over disputation, and investment in viable enterprises where the aim of making a quid is encouraged.
Speaking of quids, it is amazing what the ALP does with other people's money. In Australia, State and Federal Government debt (owed by you, the people) run up by Labor Governments before and since 2007 is up around $415 Billion. that is approximately $18,500 for each man, woman and child in Australia. If you base it on working population it is even worse at $36,000 per worker. Remember that at the federal election of 2007, all State Governments were Labor and had been for quite sometime.
So next time you think of buying a new car (a typical Holden Commodore V8 costs about $41,000) think twice and send the money to the Government so they can pay off your share of your debt. But if you do that then Holden can no longer employ people to make cars, miners will stop digging out minerals to make cars, paint manufactures will stop making paint for cars, and the list goes on.
So in reality, you cannot stop spending your hard earned readies to pay off your share of the debt as unemployment will increase and you will then have to add it to your existing liabilities (you pay tax to pay unemployed people). This is why Governments of a right persuasion have to increase taxation and decrease spending, to pay off the debt run up by the ALP. So next time you hear some bogan from the ALP, or Union, or worker belonging to a Union whinge about Coalition Governments increasing taxes and cutting back services (handouts) tell them they are actually to blame because they probably voted for decrepit ALP Governments that ran up the debt in the first place.
Speaking of debt, why is it that the ALP always manages to spend more than it can collect? Well, the answer is probably because next to none of them have any business acumen. It is a case of the inmates in charge of the asylum, handing out goodies and pills like there is no tomorrow, lusting for everything but not willing to be responsible for anything. Think of Gillard's ex boyfriend, Bruce Wilson (with a wife and 2 kiddies in Perth whist liaising with Ms Julia) and the money he "stole" from the AWU and its' Workplace Reform Fund, Wilson did not even "steal" from outside his own Union, he "stole" from the Union he worked for.
Speaking of lusting, I wonder how Craig Thomson is going?
Speaking of working, the Mining industry seems affected by something, a lurgy of sorts, that is causing it to contract. A combination of low pricing, high taxes, industrialised work practices, and a high spending Federal Government will do that to you. I guess the only thing to do is go to bed, sip lemon drinks, wait for the lurgy to go away, and under a new Coalition Federal Government, re-enter the game. The conditions should improve under new steering hands that encourage co-operation rather than enforcement, discussion over disputation, and investment in viable enterprises where the aim of making a quid is encouraged.
Speaking of quids, it is amazing what the ALP does with other people's money. In Australia, State and Federal Government debt (owed by you, the people) run up by Labor Governments before and since 2007 is up around $415 Billion. that is approximately $18,500 for each man, woman and child in Australia. If you base it on working population it is even worse at $36,000 per worker. Remember that at the federal election of 2007, all State Governments were Labor and had been for quite sometime.
So next time you think of buying a new car (a typical Holden Commodore V8 costs about $41,000) think twice and send the money to the Government so they can pay off your share of your debt. But if you do that then Holden can no longer employ people to make cars, miners will stop digging out minerals to make cars, paint manufactures will stop making paint for cars, and the list goes on.
So in reality, you cannot stop spending your hard earned readies to pay off your share of the debt as unemployment will increase and you will then have to add it to your existing liabilities (you pay tax to pay unemployed people). This is why Governments of a right persuasion have to increase taxation and decrease spending, to pay off the debt run up by the ALP. So next time you hear some bogan from the ALP, or Union, or worker belonging to a Union whinge about Coalition Governments increasing taxes and cutting back services (handouts) tell them they are actually to blame because they probably voted for decrepit ALP Governments that ran up the debt in the first place.
Speaking of debt, why is it that the ALP always manages to spend more than it can collect? Well, the answer is probably because next to none of them have any business acumen. It is a case of the inmates in charge of the asylum, handing out goodies and pills like there is no tomorrow, lusting for everything but not willing to be responsible for anything. Think of Gillard's ex boyfriend, Bruce Wilson (with a wife and 2 kiddies in Perth whist liaising with Ms Julia) and the money he "stole" from the AWU and its' Workplace Reform Fund, Wilson did not even "steal" from outside his own Union, he "stole" from the Union he worked for.
Speaking of lusting, I wonder how Craig Thomson is going?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)