Why do most of the press/bureaucrats and others think the CST is a brighter alternative than what the CM provides?
A quick look at history would show that the best alternative is CM, the options in life are broader, the safety nets are there, the freedoms that most expect are in abundance, the sun is shinier and the air fresher and cleaner.
Yet we are currently seeing CST, particularly the Totalitarian bit, pushing for the destruction of CM and replacing it with CST.
An adage in life is look for the benefits that some will receive in changes, also to get to the root issue, simply follow the money.
Firstly the money, in a CM system, there is a wide spread of wealth owners in society, from the mega wealthy to the ultra poor. A lot of the ownership of monies is the individual pushing themselves hard to gather said wealth, generally speaking the ultra poor have no such drive but use all their wealth to gain personal pleasure on a daily basis.
Those with no money or wealth will generally lust after said wealth, so they are quite easily available for turning to the CST side. In the past revolution was used to gain changes, look at France in the 1890's for the French Revolution, at Russia in the 1920's for the USSR, at China in the 1950's for the CPC, at Venezuela in the 1990's for the FRM.
Not all of the above were armed conflict, France, Russia and China were, Venezuela was an electoral process.
Nazi Germany was also a case of CST, via the ballot box to pure Dictatorship and Global Armed conflict.
Those who are keen on CST invariably are keen on control, control means death and mayhem. This is where CST leads.
CM gives hope so all involved can do what they can to get ahead, according to the rules and ability. It is the good road.
No comments:
Post a Comment